Task #11102 (new)
Opened 11 years ago
Last modified 8 years ago
BU: Undetected contrast setting in EM DVs — at Initial Version
| Reported by: | rkferguson | Owned by: | jburel |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | major | Milestone: | 5.x |
| Component: | Insight | Version: | n.a. |
| Keywords: | n.a. | Cc: | |
| Resources: | n.a. | Referenced By: | n.a. |
| References: | n.a. | Remaining Time: | n.a. |
| Sprint: | n.a. |
Description
This issue was brought up by Helio during the Oxford site visit and data has been uploaded to QA by Douglas.
EM images:
- contrast is critical
- currently appears to be giving full range no matter what
- histogram/curve usually quite narrow and steep and skewed to middle or right
- seems to be bug with trying to change range on slider
- either
- just does not respond - hangs effectively
- has no appreciable effect
- takes ages to re-render
Douglas:
The contrasting settings which are embedded in the image are ignored. I have attached the original image and then one contrasted (badly, but noticeably) to demonstrate the difference. If you open these in softworx they will appear differently, but if you import them into OMERO then the contrasted settings are ignored.
Doing this contrasting in softworx is a step the users are doing anyway, so it's very annoying for them to have to duplicate this work. Particularly as contrasting in softworx is much nicer than the OMERO tools.
Also reports problems with some metadata not being picked up from EM data files
Example files are in QA:
http://qa.openmicroscopy.org.uk/qa/feedback/7335/
