Task #11335 (closed)
Bug: Tiles incorrectly unpacked for some TIFFs
| Reported by: | rleigh | Owned by: | mlinkert |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | minor | Milestone: | 5.1.1 |
| Component: | Bio-Formats | Version: | 4.4.8 |
| Keywords: | n.a. | Cc: | saren.tasciyan@…, dennis@… |
| Resources: | n.a. | Referenced By: | n.a. |
| References: | n.a. | Remaining Time: | n.a. |
| Sprint: | n.a. |
Description (last modified by rleigh)
https://www.openmicroscopy.org/qa2/qa2/qa/feedback/7547/
See http://lists.openmicroscopy.org.uk/pipermail/ome-users/2013-July/003869.html
The file in question contains 128x128 tiles, but neither dimension is an even multiple of 128. Note that ImageMagick? also does not open the file correctly, which suggests that there is something non-standard in the way the tiles were written.
Attachments (1)
Change History (7)
comment:1 Changed 11 years ago by mlinkert
- Cc dennis@… added
- Component changed from from QA to Bio-Formats
- Reporter changed from omero-qa to rleigh
comment:2 Changed 10 years ago by mlinkert
- Milestone changed from Unscheduled to 5.1.1
Moving to 5.1.1 for triage.
comment:3 Changed 10 years ago by mlinkert
- Resolution set to fixed
- Status changed from new to closed
Current develop opens the file as expected; the image does not look strange (for a gel blot) and matches what is shown in Windows Photo Viewer.
comment:4 Changed 10 years ago by rleigh
- Description modified (diff)
Hi Melissa,
There are definitely still some missing corner-cases here. See the attached test files (or trout.openmicroscopy.org user-4 tiling/data3 for the results on import)
Should this be reopened?
comment:5 Changed 10 years ago by rleigh
- Description modified (diff)
comment:6 Changed 10 years ago by mlinkert
#12596 was opened a while back for other corner cases, which you'll note is still open. This ticket as it was originally reported is resolved.
#10972 is a duplicate of this.