Task #11513 (closed)
Opened 11 years ago
Closed 10 years ago
Bug: CZI linescan dimensions incorrect
Reported by: | rleigh | Owned by: | mlinkert |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | major | Milestone: | Unscheduled |
Component: | Bio-Formats | Version: | 4.4.8 |
Keywords: | n.a. | Cc: | aaron.ponti@… |
Resources: | n.a. | Referenced By: | n.a. |
References: | n.a. | Remaining Time: | n.a. |
Sprint: | n.a. |
Description
See:
http://lists.openmicroscopy.org.uk/pipermail/ome-users/2013-September/003953.html for original description and example image.
From showinf (current dev_4_4):
Image count = 1 RGB = true (3) Interleaved = false Indexed = false (false color) Width = 1798 Height = 312 SizeZ = 1 SizeT = 1 SizeC = 3 (effectively 1)
However, this does not match the real dimensions: 2048x1x24x1x(2?) x/y/z/t/c.
Information|Image|PixelType|0: Gray16 Information|Image|RefractiveIndex|0: 1.333 Information|Image|SizeC|0: 2 Information|Image|SizeT|0: 1 Information|Image|SizeX|0: 2048 Information|Image|SizeY|0: 1 Information|Image|SizeZ|0: 25 Information|Image|Track|ChannelRef|Id: 372658696712399224324611823933028701035 Information|Image|Track|Id: Track:1
This looks like 2-channel greyscale with false colour. But, it looks like there's only one channel (ChS1-T2) in the original metadata unless we're missing/overwriting some of the original metadata. Should we be adding suffixing channel/track numbers? Is track 1 missing? Looks like it's probably a 2-track acquisition, with only the second track shown.
Regards,
Roger
Change History (2)
comment:1 Changed 11 years ago by mlinkert
comment:2 Changed 10 years ago by mlinkert
- Resolution set to fixed
- Status changed from new to closed
Per http://lists.openmicroscopy.org.uk/pipermail/ome-users/2013-October/003969.html, the correct channel count is 2.