Task #11633 (closed)
BUG: Mapping of channels
| Reported by: | pwalczysko | Owned by: | jburel |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | major | Milestone: | 5.0.0-rc1 |
| Component: | Insight | Version: | 3.0-Beta1 |
| Keywords: | n.a. | Cc: | ux@…,, jamoore |
| Resources: | n.a. | Referenced By: | n.a. |
| References: | n.a. | Remaining Time: | n.a. |
| Sprint: | OMERO 5 Beta 2 (1) |
Description
Found during testing https://github.com/openmicroscopy/openmicroscopy/pull/1652.
When mapping the image pixel values for display in the Rendering panel, the channels do not seem to be connected to the selected mapping algorithm (for example when I select red channel and change the mapping from linear to logarithmic, the display of the image changes as expected. But when I switch the channel to green, the mapping stays apparently the same (logarithmic), but in fact I am viewing the red channel in logarithmic scale - there seem to be no correspondence. When I change back to "linear", the new choice does not seem to be respected. Not sure what the intended behaviour of this feature was, but at present it seems to be not very useful for following workflow:
- look for the values which are hard to see using different mapping methods
- change the mapping for red channel and check whether you can see something in the image
- repeat the mapping change also for green channel, blue channel and so on, checking every time how the display changes
See also attached movie.
This strange behaviour is not FLIM-images specific - it is visible also on .dv images.
Attachments (1)
Change History (6)
Changed 6 years ago by pwalczysko
comment:1 Changed 6 years ago by jburel
comment:2 Changed 6 years ago by pwalczysko
comment:3 Changed 6 years ago by jburel
- Sprint set to OMERO 5 Beta 2 (1)
- Status changed from new to accepted
comment:4 Changed 6 years ago by jburel
- Resolution set to fixed
- Status changed from accepted to closed
comment:5 Changed 6 years ago by Jean-Marie Burel <j.burel@…>
(In [8edef884869af69019b0150044346b2e967adaf3/ome.git] on branch develop) Fix map and coefficient selection. see #11633
This would be fair enough, but there is another, I guess strictly UI-side problem, which makes the behaviour very confusing for the user.