User Story #1192 (closed)
Opened 15 years ago
Closed 15 years ago
Add handshake between blitz and fs
| Reported by: | jamoore | Owned by: | cblackburn |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | major | Milestone: | OMERO-Beta4.1 |
| Component: | General | Keywords: | n.a. |
| Cc: | cblackburn | Story Points: | n.a. |
| Sprint: | n.a. | Importance: | n.a. |
| Total Remaining Time: | n.a. | Estimated Remaining Time: | n.a. |
Description
Though hard-coding a user/password into fs is feasible, it would be optimal for system administrators to have blitz provide fs with an active session (Less configuration and fewer passwords in plaintext).
Change History (5)
comment:1 Changed 15 years ago by jmoore
- Owner changed from jmoore to cblackburn
comment:2 Changed 15 years ago by cblackburn
- Milestone changed from OMERO-Beta4 to OMERO-Beta4.1
Currently fs gets a session from a blitz manager. A more formal handshake is desirable and may well be needed once fs becomes distributed.
comment:3 Changed 15 years ago by cxallan
- Milestone changed from Unscheduled to OMERO-Beta4.1
- Version 3.0-M1 deleted
comment:4 Changed 15 years ago by jmoore
Colin, I don't know if you feel we need more in the way of handshakes for configuration, etc., but the internal_service_factory() method is a fairly good solution for the moment. I have a note around here to generalize it just a bit, but that's for all the server components, not just FS.
comment:5 Changed 15 years ago by cblackburn
- Resolution set to fixed
- Status changed from new to closed
Okay Josh. This seems okay for the moment. I'll close this specific ticket for 4.1.
Colin, I'm pushing this to you for scheduling.