Warning: Can't synchronize with repository "(default)" (/home/git/ome.git does not appear to be a Git repository.). Look in the Trac log for more information.
- Timestamp:
-
11/01/12 11:53:56 (12 years ago)
- Author:
-
jmoore
- Comment:
-
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
- Property Cc sbesson rleigh added
-
initial
|
v1
|
|
6 | 6 | == Front Page == |
7 | 7 | * Is the link to genomebiology for "OME Data Model" on the front page really the best link? (also first paragraph under Goal of B-F). (Maybe this comes post-BF as a general "OME-XML" doc effort") |
8 | | * Should "Troubleshooting" under "Help" explain that it's help for devs, not users? |
9 | | * Is it clear enough from the front page how to get to the installation documentation? |
10 | 8 | |
11 | 9 | == User == |
12 | 10 | * "Other applications" could use a really nice table possibly with logos. |
13 | | * The Dataset structure table is lost at the bottom. This is a pretty important concept that could use some explaining. |
14 | | * ``users/bio-formats-downloads.txt`` I would probably have renamed ``downloads.txt`` |
15 | | * Likely remove the explicit 2 links from the ``user-info.txt`` page in favor of having everything on ``downloads.txt`` |
16 | | * The downloads section in general isn't really readable. |
17 | | * ``|image4| Daily build`` is a typo on the downloads page. |
18 | | * ``features.txt`` should likely mention imagej (e.g. ``bf-features-in-imagej.txt``). Perhaps an imagej subdirectory would be better, or a consistent naming scheme. (``imagej-*.txt``) |
| 11 | * The Dataset structure table is a pretty important concept that could use some explaining. |
| 12 | * Consider renaming the imagej pages to something more memorable (cf. bf-features-in-imagej.txt). Perhaps an imagej subdirectory would be better, or a consistent naming scheme. (``imagej-*.txt``) |
19 | 13 | * Similarly, the OMERO section which is just a bullet point should be moved "top-level". |
20 | 14 | |
21 | 15 | == Developers == |
22 | | * First bullet points under "API documentation" have an extra gap because the javadocs are a link while the other is a toctree. Perhaps restructure the text to link to the javadocs inline? |
23 | | * Similar to the downloads page, ``java-library.txt`` will need a table of some sort. |
| 16 | * First bullet points under "API documentation" have an extra gap because the "More thorough examples" are a link while the other is a toctree. Perhaps restructure the text to link inline? |
24 | 17 | * http://www.openmicroscopy.org/site/support/bio-formats-staging/developers/service.html shows the weird yellow CSS issue. (Not sure why) |
25 | | * services & dependency injection is likely not the first thing that developers need to encounter. A general re-ordering is probably in order. |
26 | | * Possibly link to a query of known issues rather than hard-code the files? (See http://www.openmicroscopy.org/site/support/bio-formats-staging/developers/export.html. Up to Melissa) |
27 | 18 | |
28 | 19 | == New content (separate PR?) == |
1.3.13-PRO © 2008-2011
Agilo Software all
rights reserved
(this page was served in: 0.14164 sec.)